Recollé Mods (
recollecters) wrote in
retrospec2019-05-17 09:31 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
(no subject)
Looks like some of you have been pretty busy. Mostly for the better, I think. I hope. I've been talking to past employees, tracking them down now while things are falling into place. They still don't really know about their past history with the company, but the knowledge was still there if you can believe that. Ask a few questions, you can bait anybody into answering. I can go into details later for anyone who's curious, but I'll keep this short and sweet. With the next string of programming and adjustments, we can have three tries to check into alternate timelines. Nothing will stick during those trials, but let's think about it this way. Check out a chain of events, see how it pans out, close the loops to make it a new reality. When everything became about actual reality-bending, I'm not sure. I don't think this is what any of us signed up for, but what's done is done. Mr. Murdock raised an interesting proposition that I think is worth considering. And a few other have, too, you know who you are. So the question is: what chains of events can we all agree on? A check is just that. It checks how things might go without actively ruining everything…I think. The power used might downgrade the more we check in which is why three's the limit, but the potential's there which is probably better than anything else. Talk it through and get back to me. It's your future. You should get a say in it at this point. Zee Carlisle Hiring Manager Retr ![]()
Characters' display names are the same as whatever has been previously chosen and are permanently locked in! Please feel free to use this post as a network mingle. Every toplevel can be considered a new post, and threadjacking is permitted. No NPC response will be given, though you're free to hit up his individual inbox later. As a friendly reminder, you may also claim one of this month's freebie by submitting a thread from this mod post. This thread must be 10 comments from you and submitted before AC closes. |
un: anna amarande
Weird thing to bring up, but it feels... important right now.
Anyway. What's everyone else's plan? Because I don't know if I can stick with the killing Vanderweele plan if we have to worry about timelines and shit.
no subject
no subject
No matter how fucking psychotic his part is.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
That will definitely fuck up our present, since it'll 100% change the events in the timeline completely.
no subject
Right now we have other stuff to worry about, though. Like if we can all agree on "killing him is a bad idea", what are the good ideas?
no subject
Good ideas are hard to come by but ultimately pan out to: do something in the present by utilizing the information from the past without messing up the past timeline.
(no subject)
un: rinaks
no subject
If he suddenly had to wipe everyone at Retrospec, how close were we getting to stopping him?
no subject
That's pretty much what I was thinking. Wiping everyone seemed really drastic, so we must have been as close as we've ever gotten.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Re: un: anna amarande
no subject
Loath the fuck as I am to admit it.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Un:Al
How much can we bend things? or more importantly, what are we going to shoot for? We need to keep goals in mind.
I don't want our struggles and growth to be for nothing, but if we can get an edge on vanderwheel, end this fight and the company treats us as equals, as partners instead of subjects and ideally those who dropped the app can come back...
I think I would be game for that,
what do you guys think?
Re: Un:Al
Like, how do we even go about all that? Zee says we can try changing something in the past, but what could we change?
no subject
Maybe hiding something in the past so we can find it in the future? Or if money is an issue to rebuild the company from scrap, but, you know, better, maybe we could go back in time like...a hundred years, open up stock thing or whatever, then bam, we have enough money for the resources we need to build everything up again.
I think those would be the two things off the top of my head of how we can make now better but keep all the growth so the future will be better?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
un: malik
Re: un: malik
no subject
Forget it, it'll just start another argument and no one will listen to someone that's in the minority anyway. Ugh.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Re: un: malik
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
What came first? Agatha's employment with the Spinnato family or her relationship with Vanderweele?
And didn't Vanderweele want to get Spinnato out of the way because he knew Spinnato wouldn't agree with his plan to use soul energy?
That being said, I think the murder of the Spinnato twins is something we could look at. It's what I ended up talking with Zee about in the past.
no subject
What did Zee say about the past?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)