Naoto Shirogane (
truedetective) wrote in
retrospec2017-06-01 01:41 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
I reach out to the truth; text
It's no secret that what we've experienced over the past several months has been unnatural, to say the least. Things that shouldn't be possible have been occurring with regularity. Our memories have been changing, our physical bodies have been changing, the world has been changing, and sometimes it seems that though we are the only ones aware of it.
Upon observation and analysis, I have a theory-- rather, a hypothesis. I'm not entirely happy with it, because it seems ridiculous even to me. Yet it would seem to explain everything that is going on here. I've yet to encounter a piece of evidence that would disprove it... though I welcome any suggestions, because as I've said, I don't like the implications either.
Before we get to my hypothesis, let's examine the oddities we've faced.
1) Memory alteration, version 1. (Which may in fact be memory preservation.) We are the only ones aware of changes to the world and the prior state, such as the existence of horses.
2) Memory alteration, version 2. We have awakened to "hallucinomemories" of things that seem impossible, of lives we've never lived, of people we've never met. Often, these memories accompany us remembering skills and abilities that return fully and immediately-- such as a completely new set of languages spoken.
3) Physical changes. Eye color, hair color, even physical limbs changing to something new.
4) World changes. We all shrank, temporarily, while the rest of the world did not.
It is worth noting that these only ever apply to users on Retrospec. There doesn't seem to be any instance of non-Retrospec users encountering these; moreover, people who did not previously use Retrospec but who were given access to the app suddenly began experiencing these as well. For that reason, I believe Retrospec users are "awakened" of some kind. I don't know if that's the best term, I'm not a writer.
----------
But I digress. The point is this: I believe that this world is a simulation of some kind. We are inside some sort of vast computer program.
However, we are real people. I don't know whether our physical bodies are hooked up to some computer in "reality" or our minds were copied, but we existed elsewhere at some point. This is the reason for items 2 and 3: The "hallucinomemories" we've been having, the skills we've been relearning, the physical changes... these aren't invented. We're remembering our real selves, our prior lives. I'm sure of this much; I have personally remembered shared experiences with other "awakened" Retrospec users, with shared details that none of us had told the other.
This also explains items 4 and 1. As a simulation, the world and its parameters can be changed. It would be trivial to change our size, or to replace horses with chocobos.
Retrospec is the key to this, obviously. I do not yet know whether it is intrinsic to our being "awakened" or if it merely exists as a means for the simulation operators to keep tabs on us. But it, and the company behind it, do seem to be the masterminds.
Think about it: Isn't it odd that a social media company would limit its presence to a single city? Where are the nationwide Retrospec users, where are the international ones? Does that mean that this city alone is the simulator?
Again, I am aware that this seems far fetched. But this theory does seem to explain every question we've encountered, and I can't think of any data to disprove it. If you know of any information that might make this less likely, I eagerly await it.
I don't like the idea of being a data simulation any more than you all do. But I am resolved to find the truth, even if it's unpleasant.
-N
Upon observation and analysis, I have a theory-- rather, a hypothesis. I'm not entirely happy with it, because it seems ridiculous even to me. Yet it would seem to explain everything that is going on here. I've yet to encounter a piece of evidence that would disprove it... though I welcome any suggestions, because as I've said, I don't like the implications either.
Before we get to my hypothesis, let's examine the oddities we've faced.
1) Memory alteration, version 1. (Which may in fact be memory preservation.) We are the only ones aware of changes to the world and the prior state, such as the existence of horses.
2) Memory alteration, version 2. We have awakened to "hallucinomemories" of things that seem impossible, of lives we've never lived, of people we've never met. Often, these memories accompany us remembering skills and abilities that return fully and immediately-- such as a completely new set of languages spoken.
3) Physical changes. Eye color, hair color, even physical limbs changing to something new.
4) World changes. We all shrank, temporarily, while the rest of the world did not.
It is worth noting that these only ever apply to users on Retrospec. There doesn't seem to be any instance of non-Retrospec users encountering these; moreover, people who did not previously use Retrospec but who were given access to the app suddenly began experiencing these as well. For that reason, I believe Retrospec users are "awakened" of some kind. I don't know if that's the best term, I'm not a writer.
----------
But I digress. The point is this: I believe that this world is a simulation of some kind. We are inside some sort of vast computer program.
However, we are real people. I don't know whether our physical bodies are hooked up to some computer in "reality" or our minds were copied, but we existed elsewhere at some point. This is the reason for items 2 and 3: The "hallucinomemories" we've been having, the skills we've been relearning, the physical changes... these aren't invented. We're remembering our real selves, our prior lives. I'm sure of this much; I have personally remembered shared experiences with other "awakened" Retrospec users, with shared details that none of us had told the other.
This also explains items 4 and 1. As a simulation, the world and its parameters can be changed. It would be trivial to change our size, or to replace horses with chocobos.
Retrospec is the key to this, obviously. I do not yet know whether it is intrinsic to our being "awakened" or if it merely exists as a means for the simulation operators to keep tabs on us. But it, and the company behind it, do seem to be the masterminds.
Think about it: Isn't it odd that a social media company would limit its presence to a single city? Where are the nationwide Retrospec users, where are the international ones? Does that mean that this city alone is the simulator?
Again, I am aware that this seems far fetched. But this theory does seem to explain every question we've encountered, and I can't think of any data to disprove it. If you know of any information that might make this less likely, I eagerly await it.
I don't like the idea of being a data simulation any more than you all do. But I am resolved to find the truth, even if it's unpleasant.
-N
text
But I do not want to believe that this is but a simulation.
What would that mean for our lives here?
And what would the purpose of such a thing be?
Text
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
no subject
[Though really, the distance they'd talked about was barely past the woods, so she wasn't sure it really counted.]
Some of the things we experience don't even seem to fit what little I have seen of a simulation. I'm not entirely convinced. I do think it's a possible description, and perhaps it might prove correct. But I also think that now that we are into the "Fantastic," there are other possibilities that we may not have even guessed at.
Keep searching, sir, but I'm not quite ready to make a final judgment. Not yet, anyway.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
no subject
And no, I don't think it seems too far fetched a theory. It actually lines up, though it could easily be a magical illusion, or a forced dream, or any other similar concept depending on your world view.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
no subject
Ive lived in places all over the country before i moved to recolle
If this city is the only simulator shouldnt that be impossible?
[Not that it would cancel out the rest by any means, but he has his doubts on that particular part.]
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
no subject
is that what you are saying?
I know you explicitly said "we are real people," but then you turned right around and said "but this isn't reality and our lives and experiences aren't real, only our hallucinomemories are"
which basically invalidates everything about our existence as we know it
(side note can we pleeease just call them visions, hallucinomemories is a terrible word)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
curious as to how two people having a few of the same hallucination equals "remembering our real selves" though
seems a bit much to discount an entire lifetime of memories in favor of that, don't you think?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
[He refuses. Absolutely not.]
maybe we are in the matrix, but how would all of these visions come from the same "reality"? mine was in space over a desert planet, on a ship that was so advanced it seemed impossible. someone else fought a scaled monster with a sword. and from what i've read, there are people with ones from a world that seems exactly like this one.
how would those all be from the same reality? and more than that, how would they have gotten all of us in the same place, if we really are trapped somewhere and hooked up to some virtual world?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
...
...
...
...
no subject
The memories I have received and heard about all seem not to correlate to each other, and they're mostly fantastical or nonsensical. If this isn't the real world, then why would the real one be less cohesive? I am curious about these "shared memories" you had with friends. What were they like?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
no subject
I'm the last person to discourage the notion of seeking knowledge for its own sake, to do with as you see fit - but in this circumstance, you're talking about discarding an entire existence as false when it seems to have been everything but. Simulation or otherwise, our experiences still exist, do they not? Even if we assume that this is a simulation of some sort, that doesn't invalidate the choices we've made within it.
If an experience is indistinguishable from reality, that makes it reality - at least to a degree. We continue to experience things, even in your brains in a vat scenario - as such, I really have to wonder what you plan on doing once you (hypothetically speaking) manage to prove that scenario true.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Still, I find it a little hard to believe, even if I've been through my own changes.
What about the people here that aren't native to Recolle?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
no subject
Makes more sense that going either cult or suicidal death-doesn't-matter-because-it's-all-a-game, dontcha think?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
no subject
The question is, why? Are these memories of our 'real' selves, or of some other invention? We all seem to come from disparate worlds, with disparate 'memories' - so what ties us together in this one, if anything, or is it a multiverse sort of situation?
And then where do we go after that? Do we find this home, if it's even alive anymore? We find the truth, but then we have to have a plan for what to do next.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
but also yeah its kinda weird that everyone on the network happens to live in recolle
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
you think the rest of the world doesnt even exist ?
thats kind of crazy
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
r u saying were not real
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text
That makes a lot of sense.
But I really don't like it. Doesn't that mean we're totally helpless?
text
text
text
text
text
no subject
So it would put more credibility in the simulation or reincarnation theory.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
now in private
private
(no subject)
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
no subject
That does explain things neatly, but I'm of a mind to reserve judgment until we get more solid evidence. What little I know of psychology would also hold water. Brains can be tricked, and also papers can be forged. There's a lot to be suspicious of.
I know some people have left the city and stopped being Retrospec users as a result, but is it because of proximity or something else? If we're following your theory on this being a computer simulation, then is it possible that someone leaving means that we get deleted or stored somewhere else? On the other hand, if it's reincarnation, then is it because of this city or Retrospec itself interfering?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
[ Souji... feels uncertain about his memories and he talked about this to Shin, about how he doesn't see Yu in any of his memories and how they seem to share a memory as well. Shin brought forth the possibility of reincarnation from a single person which Souji doesn't completely believe in but it's something to consider. ]
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
1/2
➟ action
(no subject)
no subject
Whatever may come of our lives here — the feelings we have, the bonds we've made — those are our own. I refuse to believe they are being controlled by someone else.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
...
...
no subject
If this is all a simulation that began a few months ago, and everything before it was an implated memory, why stop there? We could all have been programmed into being five minutes ago, if that's the case. Or five seconds ago, or five milliseconds ago, or a single Planck second ago. How would we know the diference?
And for that matter, how does any of us know anyone else in this city is real? "Cogito ergo sum", as you rightly say, but that only applies to the cognizant individual in question. For all you know, I and every word I have typed thus far are just a memory that has appeared along with your just-created awareness an infintessimal moment ago.
And so forth, and so forth.
Don't missunderstand: I appreciate any kind of debate and discussion about these goings-on, theorizing included. I just don't think that this is an especially fruitful path to go down.
(no subject)