![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
- bioshock: eleanor lamb,
- blazblue: ragna the bloodedge,
- borderlands: handsome jack,
- dokidoki precure: alice yotsuba,
- dokidoki precure: makoto kenzaki,
- dokidoki precure: mana aida,
- dokidoki precure: rikka hishikawa,
- fate: saber,
- ghost in the shell: togusa,
- guilty gear: may,
- gundam wing: duo maxwell,
- harry potter: remus lupin,
- homestuck: dirk strider,
- kingdom hearts: riku,
- osomatsu-san: jyushimatsu matsuno,
- persona 4: yukiko amagi,
- saints row: matt miller,
- toz: sorey,
- yes precure 5: karen minazuki
(no subject)
John R. Lunise
2/8 near RecolleOn the subject of horses, allow me to ask you a question: When you were a child, what was the name of the bear family who taught valuable life lessons in easily digestible books? Chances are, you answered 'the Berenstein Bears'. And, as it happens, that is incorrect; it is the Berenstain Bears.
How can everyone misremember this? How can something so patently true turn out to be terribly false? Some people will tell you it is the 'Mandela effect', named after a shockingly large number of people believed Nelson Mandela died in prison... but simple mass misremembering is a fairly boring answer, isn't it?
Consider instead a possibility physics allows us: that infinite universes exist, that every possibility spawns a diverging universe. Consider then that these different universes must be ruled by mathematics and science, that were were able to observe them, some concrete, tangible difference must exist to distinguish them.
Consider also that the laws of physics as we know them are, in some cases, simply and utterly inoperable. The quantum scale, for example. Or a naked singularity. It is, therefore, conceivable that through some quirk of physics, some awesome miracle... we have merged or shifted into a world in which horses never existed, and chocobos always did.
Impossible, you say, and perhaps rightly so... but I have no better explanation.
no subject
Alice Penelope Drake That's the only explanation for people believing it was always Berenstain.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Matt Miller this would have to be some incredibly strong anomaly we're dealing with if you're right
no subject
John R. Lunise Bird of this size and ferocity existed in prehistory; would it be so great a distortion of record for them to have persisted and been domesticated in place of horses, who instead died out?
John R. Lunise With all else being equal, we're looking at a mild tweak to one number in an infinitely complex formula.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Alicia Clover It would be impossible to say it's, well, impossible. There isn't enough information to disprove such a theory. Although I feel a little uncomfortable that we've experienced such a once-in-a-lifetime event to replace equines with massive birds. And why us? Why now? There are too many variables. That's... not a scientifically sound experiment.
no subject
John R. Lunise We lack another one, after all.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
no subject
Dirk Strider Sure, we could slip from a universe with horses to a universe where chocobos evolved instead.
Dirk Strider But we don't have a universe where chocobos evolved. Not in a way that makes sense.
Dirk Strider The biology texts should say that chocobos evolved from some chicken ancestor. They shouldn't say they're of the genus Equus and mate with donkeys to make mules.
Dirk Strider That isn't an alternate universe.
Dirk Strider It is, straight-up, a shitty job doing find + replace.
no subject
John R. Lunise But since all of this is untestable, we have to ask what fits the available evidence, and in the absence of any other factors, what we prefer to believe.
no subject
Jack Dawes but i'm gonna need some of that weed you're smoking
no subject
John R. Lunise Except possibly salvia, I've heard some stories.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
...
...
...
...
...
no subject
Jyushimatsu Ono So if we shifted worlds, doesn't that mean that there could be a world out there that's missing us right now? LOL I wonder if anyone notices we're gone!
Jyushimatsu Ono Maybe we were replaced by chocobos too!
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Surei Doushi Mikleo and I argued about this for two hours once before I looked up the books. I guess not everyone has photographic memory though
Surei Doushi that said, things are really weird lately and I wouldn't discredit your theory too much. it feels like we're part of some prank but my mother swears up and down she has no idea what I'm talking about.
Surei Doushi people can pretend they don't know what horses are but it's a little harder to make up an animal and then... you know... have it exist
no subject
John R. Lunise Much the same way looking up horses now gets you nothing.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Dante Rantanen nobody told me retrospec was code for "online classes"
Dante Rantanen if you all start assigning homework i'm out
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
i am so sorry for this
never apologize!
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
...
...
...
...
...
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Eleanor Lamb And how would whoever runs this retrospect app have known who to send it to?
no subject
John R. Lunise Are you implying you have evidence that only people on this social network are affected, though?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Maya Aimoto But that goes without saying, I guess!
Maya Aimoto I guess it would be nice if there could be SOME explanation for all this. Even if it seems way too far out there.
Maya Aimoto but also how dare you remind me of the Berenstein/Berenstain thing (´;︵;`)
no subject
John R. Lunise We may never know it, but that would be a poor reason not to try.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Hitori Togusa But in a social aspect, which name looks more like one that you might have encountered from a real person? Which ending is more common? -stein or -stain?
Hitori Togusa Your mind jumps to the one that it thinks is more correct, and looks more 'right' regardless of which is correct.
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Ragna Edgson "infinite universes"?
Ragna Edgson that's some sci-fi level bullshit
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)