manufactured: (001. your world is an ashtray)
Albert Wesker ([personal profile] manufactured) wrote in [community profile] retrospec2018-03-12 12:50 am

005. Text // my world is unaffected

It's been some time since Retrospec has properly dropped some sort of identity crisis on us, though I suppose it's good to know that we're getting a bit more information out of them now than we were in the past; I'm in no way looking down on small favors and silver linings. Just the same, I wonder for the time being where that leaves us - I know I've asked a few of you about this in the past, and I'm sure that a fair amount of you have made your decisions regarding it since.

I suppose what I want to hear is your thoughts on these people you're receiving memories of, whether you consider them "you" or otherwise - do you still think of them as a separate person from yourself or do you consider them to be the same as "you", and why you've come to feel that way. I'm not going to argue for feeling one way or another on the matter, I'm just wondering how you've come to see these people that technically don't exist anymore.

Of course, if you reject this entire matter completely and just consider this to be an example of some corporate entity you hate ruining your life for no apparent reason, that's likewise fair.

I've formed my own views on this fairly recently; I tend to find it calming, having some sort of conclusion that I can accept as reasonably true for the time being. It's not always convenient, but it's calming.
dulynoted: (pic#12018027)

[personal profile] dulynoted 2018-03-17 04:31 am (UTC)(link)
Is that so? Then all the more reason I'd like to know your thoughts.

Inherently supposed to be is an interesting way to look at it. What makes you feel that the person in these visions is our real self? Or should I say "ideal self"?


[ He isn't sure he agrees, but he doesn't disagree, either. (At least for now. Give him a few months and he'll be singing a different tune entirely.) ]
dulynoted: (pic#12017917)

[personal profile] dulynoted 2018-03-19 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
[ Something fundamental, intrinsic...hm. The idea in and of itself has merit. He had been trying to investigate common themes in visions and memories, more so to see if people are linked because of them, if they prompt more frequent memories. Not what sort of value they could hold, or how closely they may fit to someone's idea of themselves.

It's food for thought. He appreciates it. ]


I admit I hadn't considered that vein, that there's something core to ourselves that is in both instances. I also agree that the concept of the soul is one difficult to reconcile without subscribing to belief as opposed to evidence, which makes it difficult to quantity. But I don't need to tell you that.

I feel that entertaining any sort of thought experiments with Retrospec requires that we accept some some level of belief.
dulynoted: (pic#12017652)

[personal profile] dulynoted 2018-03-23 05:28 am (UTC)(link)
Those stones were interesting, to say the least. An acquaintance of mine was wondering what might happen if he broke his, but I never found out if he did or not.
dulynoted: (pic#11896998)

[personal profile] dulynoted 2018-03-24 04:40 am (UTC)(link)
What changed? If you don't mind me asking.
dulynoted: (pic#11944514)

[personal profile] dulynoted 2018-03-24 05:01 am (UTC)(link)
Understandable. Experiencing extreme emotion seemed to be the main purpose of them. But I'm still not sure how intentional these events are.
dulynoted: (pic#12017654)

[personal profile] dulynoted 2018-03-24 05:24 am (UTC)(link)
So you believe them?
dulynoted: (pic#11734141)

[personal profile] dulynoted 2018-03-27 03:49 am (UTC)(link)
No apparent benefit, I will give you that.

[ He's definitely on the fence about that. ]