furtherforward: (「useless things. unnecessary things.」)
御堂筋翔くん || Akira Midousuji ([personal profile] furtherforward) wrote in [community profile] retrospec2017-03-08 01:11 am

(no subject)

LISTEN UP. Retrospec can read this all they like, I don't care. their cameras were trained on me the entire time I combed through their office anyway. they INVITED me there. so here I am, putting my findings out here so that all users can access it. you can respond helpfully, or cower behind your phones in silence, and to what end? Retrospec already knows about your precious secrets. or have you gnats forgotten that already??
Akira Midousuji shared a photo.
3/8 near Apprassage


respond if you know any of the following names:
Dante Sparda
Irene Greenland
Machi Tobaye
Jyushimatsu Ono
Matt Miller

give me evidence that you know them, and we can talk more. don't waste my time with "OOOH I MET THEM ONCE"s if there's no substance. a single detail about their history will suffice as proof.

and since I expect the lot of you to share any information you find in the future, in this fashion... what the REST of you need to know is that I found files on these people in an unlocked room in the Retrospec building. apparently some of these people were once Retrospec users, but for some reason they're not anymore. (you can extend your gratitude to Dave for sorting through all of your nonsense to locate posts by these people.) these files documented their personal histories. DETAILED, by the way. are they accurate? that's what I'm trying to figure out.

ohhh right: the note pictured was clipped only to that file. make of this what you will.
agathism: (❃ looking away)

[personal profile] agathism 2017-03-10 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
I thought it was given they had all of this information about us.
Why else invite certain people to be users while the rest of the world isn't overly concern over this app acting like an inclusive club?

My question is: why did Restrospec cordially invite you to their headquarters? And, could it be possible you were lead to that door intentionally?
I believe those two questions are more important than validating easily found files about those many of us may not know or have only met once.
agathism: (❃ debate face)

[personal profile] agathism 2017-03-16 01:05 am (UTC)(link)
I think the PURPOSE may be the more dire issue we need to focus on. The HOW and ACCURACY are useless. Nowadays, it's simple to gain that kind of information on anyone with the internet being used the way it is. Our information is easily accessible and sold to all kinds of different cooperations. Using search engines, alone, helps these businesses learn more about our personalities than the actual government does.

Retrospec is no different, imho.

If movies and tv shows have taught us anything, maybe they want to lead us on the wrong track by distracting us from their true goals. I just can't believe they'll freely allow us to trade information like this without censoring or making a huge ordeal over this. Something doesn't feel right to me.