truedetective: (01)
Naoto Shirogane ([personal profile] truedetective) wrote in [community profile] retrospec2017-05-11 09:56 pm

(no subject)

As long as the changes were being made to our memories, it was plausible to argue that this was some sort of hypnosis, something done by Retrospec to our brains. However:

1) The experiment to disconnect from electronics that may be affected by Retrospec returned no results. We still felt the effects while disconnected.

2) This "shrinking" and the holes in reality cannot be explained by hypnosis. They are very real.

At what point do we begin to question the fabric of reality itself?

-N
true_noir: (Bored)

[personal profile] true_noir 2017-05-12 02:09 am (UTC)(link)
Being brutally honest? In January, when speaking with a few people, but it wasn't something I was comfortable admitting then. I'm still not comfortable with it, but I also can't change it.

But what is the alternative, really?
standalonehuman: (TogusaCoffeeWork)

[personal profile] standalonehuman 2017-05-12 02:27 am (UTC)(link)
There are limits to what Retrospec can do. Everything they alter, it feels like it's only a simple replacement, it's not arbitrary. Everything that changes needs to still fill the purpose of what came before it. At least, from our perspective.

But we're almost getting into a distinction between reality, and the experiencing of reality. Our reality is no longer the same as everyone not on the application.
cattack: (pic#4867983)

[personal profile] cattack 2017-05-12 02:36 am (UTC)(link)
This does rule out hypnosis, but I have few other ideas.
The worst among them being that none of this is real, but some sort of science fiction-esque simulation.
I would have said a month ago that that was impossible, but I would have said the same of being shrunk down to the size of an insect.
matchbreaker: (Captain Marvel)

[personal profile] matchbreaker 2017-05-12 02:42 am (UTC)(link)
If that was your theory, did you get a CT Scan?
vendettastool: (boredom)

[personal profile] vendettastool 2017-05-12 02:58 am (UTC)(link)
I'm still thinking about this in terms of code and design but it makes less sense because we are real.
Then again, what is real can be subjected to a person's own personal idea of reality.
true_noir: Aged Up Commission (Really Now?)

[personal profile] true_noir 2017-05-12 03:07 am (UTC)(link)
I refuse to dignify them with that title. But we do seem to be at the whim of something that can affect what is, not what seems to be. Unless our earlier talks about perception are really that pivotal right now.

I think we're stretching the possibility of an illusion pretty far, however.
cattack: (pic#3478400)

[personal profile] cattack 2017-05-12 03:09 am (UTC)(link)
Yes.
I'm not familiar with the movies myself, but I know of them.
And other options, such as divine powers, seem worse.
feistytrader: (okay then)

[personal profile] feistytrader 2017-05-12 03:15 am (UTC)(link)
Just what the doctor ordered today. An identity crisis. Reality just got kind of weird. That's enough, isn't it?
standalonehuman: (TogusaConcerned)

[personal profile] standalonehuman 2017-05-12 03:15 am (UTC)(link)
Let's keep on that idea, though. Even the physical alterations people have been experiencing, what if that's just a change in perception? Eye color, hair color, and in some cases, injuries? When perception is changed, you can see what wasn't there before.
vendettastool: (something somewhere)

[personal profile] vendettastool 2017-05-12 03:28 am (UTC)(link)
And how much of that reality as a thinking being can also be suspect since we are wired to actually replace memories from the start.

Which begs the question about how much of these hallucimemories are suspect since they appear from nowhere, or if we had glossed over them to make the memories we have now.
thisloveisjustice: (clueless)

[personal profile] thisloveisjustice 2017-05-12 04:23 am (UTC)(link)
Okay, I don't even know where to begin with the whole shrinking thing. Maybe compressing the space between atoms, but how to only affect humans... Anyway, what holes in reality?
biellmann: (incorrect latin translation: the drink)

[personal profile] biellmann 2017-05-12 04:46 am (UTC)(link)
Personally I'm already at that point. I mean I'm not a scientist but I think it's impossible to do something like shrink a person without killing them. And how would they do it overnight to so many people without anyone noticing? Even if you could do it you would need some kind of crazy machine right?
accordance: all by <user name="feonixe"> (Default)

[personal profile] accordance 2017-05-12 01:30 pm (UTC)(link)
There is the possibility of reverse hypnosis, as if we are the ones awake and the others are still dreaming.
skald: (kahdeksantoista)

[personal profile] skald 2017-05-13 02:37 am (UTC)(link)
Ooh, so you tried ignoring your phones to see if things would appear normal again? What a good idea. So you still noticed that we were tiny even though you didn't log on for a while?
true_noir: (Cloak9)

[personal profile] true_noir 2017-05-13 02:48 am (UTC)(link)
I'm Catholic, so I like to think we have a fairly strict attitude on this sort of thing. I'm willing to go with magician, though. Merlin was pretty powerful in the old tales, was he not?

Page 1 of 10