recollecters: (Default)
Recollé Mods ([personal profile] recollecters) wrote in [community profile] retrospec2017-02-02 02:42 pm
Entry tags:

loading...overflow

Welcome to Retrospec™, the last social media network you will ever need. You are one of the few selected to test this exciting new platform based on our cutting-edge algorithms. Less than two hundred invitations have gone out, and membership is not currently open to the public. However, we hope you will come to see how useful Retrospec™ is, given time. We have for your use a variety of features such as text, voice, video, and image posts. We encourage you to explore our many options.

Please feel free to use this post as a network mingle. Every toplevel can be considered a new post, and threadjacking is permitted. No NPC response will be given. As a reminder, everything besides uploading a profile picture and information was locked until this post. Usernames are the character's full real AU names, not aliases or chosen nicknames or usernames, and seemed to have filled themselves in; nothing characters do can change or obscure their names currently. Oddly, profile pictures still cannot be swapped out at this time, so hopefully you took a good one.

This post is an overflow from the original post here. Feel free to either carry over threads from there or create entirely new ones.
swordere: (♪ sᴇǫᴜᴇɴᴢᴀ ɪᴠ)

[personal profile] swordere 2017-02-06 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
......It's a really really really weird glitch?

[...]

Okay I got nothing, but I'm sure there is a reason.
strongestheart: (139)

[personal profile] strongestheart 2017-02-06 05:13 am (UTC)(link)
It happens consistently, so yeah, there's definitely a REASON!

...it's just a question of whether or not the explanation is anything good.
swordere: (♪ ᴀ̀ ᴛʜᴇ́ʀᴇ̀sᴇ)

[personal profile] swordere 2017-02-06 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Well. Logical.

I don't have any faith in it being good, considering the lack of any communication from the devs so far.
strongestheart: (153)

[personal profile] strongestheart 2017-02-07 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
On the other hand, it can't be THAT bad, right? Unless they've hacked our financial information. But if not that, we should be... alright?
swordere: (♪ sᴇǫᴜᴇɴᴢᴀ ɪᴠ)

[personal profile] swordere 2017-02-07 02:59 am (UTC)(link)
If they've hacked that, we should notice soon enough. So if we're screwed, we're screwed.

But yes, let's assume that's not the case. We'll cross that bridge when we get to it, etc.
strongestheart: (066)

[personal profile] strongestheart 2017-02-08 03:52 am (UTC)(link)
I'd like to be a LITTLE more optimistic than that.

...I just don't like leaving things up to chance, though!
swordere: (♪ ᴀʟʙᴏʀᴀᴅᴀ ᴅᴇʟ ɢʀᴀᴄɪᴏsᴏ)

[personal profile] swordere 2017-02-09 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
That's fine. You can be the optimistic and I'll be pessimistic enough for the both of us.

That way we're covered.
strongestheart: (005)

[personal profile] strongestheart 2017-02-09 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
That just sounds like it cancels itself out!
swordere: (♪ ᴠᴇxᴀᴛɪᴏɴs)

[personal profile] swordere 2017-02-09 02:16 am (UTC)(link)
........I don't think it works like that.
strongestheart: (004)

[personal profile] strongestheart 2017-02-09 03:49 am (UTC)(link)
Are you sure??

If one person is trying to be positive and the other person is trying to be negative, is anyone happy???
swordere: (♪ sᴇǫᴜᴇɴᴢᴀ ɪᴠ)

[personal profile] swordere 2017-02-09 04:00 am (UTC)(link)
The positive person is.

I'm pretty sure that's like the whole point.
strongestheart: (129)

[personal profile] strongestheart 2017-02-09 04:09 am (UTC)(link)
But then the positive person will be sad.

(´;︵;`)
swordere: (♪ ᴍɪɴᴜᴛᴇ ᴡᴀʟᴛᴢ)

[personal profile] swordere 2017-02-09 04:15 am (UTC)(link)
Then they're not very good at being positive.
strongestheart: (155)

[personal profile] strongestheart 2017-02-09 04:16 am (UTC)(link)
(╯︵╰,)

Then I guess I'm just not very good!
swordere: (♪ sᴄᴀʀʙᴏ)

[personal profile] swordere 2017-02-09 04:18 am (UTC)(link)
So be better.

😑
strongestheart: (083)

[personal profile] strongestheart 2017-02-09 04:20 am (UTC)(link)
FINE, THEN! I WILL BE!

I'LL BE EVEN MORE POSITIVE! ╭( ・ㅂ・)و
swordere: (♪ ᴠᴇxᴀᴛɪᴏɴs)

[personal profile] swordere 2017-02-09 04:21 am (UTC)(link)
Well, that didn't take much encouragement.

But yes. You do that. Hurray.


[Why does she feel like she made a mistake.]
strongestheart: (022)

[personal profile] strongestheart 2017-02-09 04:22 am (UTC)(link)
[It doesn't take much.]

I WILL! YOU'LL SEE!

[Because now?

Now she's never going to leave you alone.

Ever.]
swordere: (♪ ᴏʀᴀɢᴇ)

[personal profile] swordere 2017-02-09 04:23 am (UTC)(link)
No, I believe you, I don't need to see.
strongestheart: (027)

[personal profile] strongestheart 2017-02-09 04:25 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, don't you worry! You will! I'll make sure of it! ٩( ᐛ )و
swordere: (♪ ᴍᴇɴᴜᴇᴛ ᴀɴᴛɪǫᴜᴇ)

[personal profile] swordere 2017-02-09 04:27 am (UTC)(link)
...........

Did you mean for that to sound ominous, because it sounded ominous.
strongestheart: (005)

[personal profile] strongestheart 2017-02-09 04:27 am (UTC)(link)
Why would I make something sound ominous? I mean it!
swordere: (♪ ɪʙᴇʀɪᴀ)

[personal profile] swordere 2017-02-09 04:28 am (UTC)(link)
Yes, that's the ominous part.
strongestheart: (006)

[personal profile] strongestheart 2017-02-09 05:20 am (UTC)(link)
No way, that'd imply something bad!
swordere: (♪ ᴠᴇxᴀᴛɪᴏɴs)

[personal profile] swordere 2017-02-09 06:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes. Exactly.

[The bad thing is your optimism in her life, Maya.

...Which sounds really mean so she's not gonna... outright say that.]

(no subject)

[personal profile] strongestheart - 2017-02-10 03:45 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] swordere - 2017-02-10 22:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] strongestheart - 2017-02-11 08:54 (UTC) - Expand