Recollé Mods (
recollecters) wrote in
retrospec2017-05-02 10:32 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
loading...overflow...
Welcome to Retrospec™, the last social media network you will ever need. You are one of the few selected to test this exciting new platform based on our cutting-edge algorithms. Less than two hundred invitations have gone out, and membership is not currently open to the public. However, we hope you will come to see how useful Retrospec™ is, given time. We have for your use a variety of features such as text, voice, video, and image posts. We encourage you to explore our many options. Anyway, now that the copypaste part is out of the way! Jim here, requesting you guys make your secret meetings a little more exciting. It's not like you're not trying with the whole "let's meet off the network!" dealio, but I have some serious concerns. For one thing, no secret handshakes or phrases? Not even dramatic meeting locations? The trying rating is about half a star if that. And I'm almost bored to tears with the whole back and forth about what's going on. Not bored enough to give you a cheat sheet, but still. I can't get myself taken off surveillance duty, so at least try to make it a little more exciting! You guys might like this wikihow. Later! Jim Halloway Research & Development Retr ![]() Please feel free to use this post as a network mingle. Every toplevel can be considered a new post, and threadjacking is permitted. No NPC response will be given. Usernames are the character's full real AU names, not aliases or chosen nicknames or usernames, and seemed to have filled themselves in; nothing characters do can change or obscure their names currently. Characters who have been in game for more than one month will find they can change their profile pictures; newcomers are locked into their first choice. At various points throughout the day users will be sent images of themselves from behind, regardless of where they are. There doesn't seem to be any way to catch whoever might be taking and sending these, however, especially since being alone in a room doesn't seem to be a deterrent. This post is an overflow from the original post here. Feel free to either carry over threads from there or create entirely new ones. |
no subject
Good luck to you too, though, however you choose to respond to them.
no subject
let me know if you find anything helpful?
no subject
no subject
but maybe we should look into encrypting this stuff anyway
god forbid jim get bored with us
no subject
(OOC: But if you want to assume Leo picks up a decoder ring off of her, she'll be happily giving them out in a few days. Encryption on the cheap!)
no subject
might be time to go back to snail mail until we figure something out
(ooc: you betcha he’ll be nabbing one!)
no subject
no subject
don’t ask me how they got those but we should probably keep it in mind
cause, like, if they can stalk us, wouldn’t they be able to read a note on someone’s door?
no subject
In theory, though, yes.
[Admittedly, they could also read their mail, and she was thinking of some pretty aggressive ways to avoid their notes being seen if at all possible.
God, she was even considering invisible ink.]
no subject
fan-freaking-tastic
remember when scam emails were our biggest problems with the internet
we didn’t know how good we had it
it would be nearly impossible for all of us to coordinate on coding this stuff though, especially if we do it the old-fashioned way
and then if new people get the app we’d have to tell them about it too?
it’s going to be hard to pull off, but that’s probably what they want
no subject
Probably, but it also isn't impossible. It's really more of a question of getting organized, more than anything. That, and being patient with the new ones. They're not always ready to listen.
no subject
yeah i get it, i wasn't exactly the first person to get suspicious of these guys
it's not really the easiest thing to convince people of without evidence, y'know?
and we don't have a lot of that
no subject