recollecters: (Default)
Recollé Mods ([personal profile] recollecters) wrote in [community profile] retrospec2017-06-01 06:01 pm

loading...

Hey, Users! This month's wikihow is right over here. In other news, don't you just love our logo colors? Such a nice shade of blue. I'm pretty fond of it myself! You know, Janet has blue eyes. But then, I guess you guys don't know anyone with eyes that color anymore, right? Whoops.

Anyway, see you next month! Well, some of you anyway. :)

Jim Halloway
Research & Development
Retrspec Incorporated

As discussed on the monthly plot post the colors blue and green are now gray - except for the blue on the retrospec application logo and their building sign, although no NPC will be capable of seeing the color in these places. As stated in the plot post, NPCs will also seem to be completely unaware that the colors blue and green ever existed. Oops.

Please feel free to use this post as a network mingle. Every toplevel can be considered a new post, and threadjacking is permitted. No NPC response will be given. Usernames are the character's full real AU names, not aliases or chosen nicknames or usernames, and seemed to have filled themselves in; nothing characters do can change or obscure their names currently. Last's month's application round characters are now capable of changing their profile pictures.
roseblooms: didn't you pay attention playing metal gear solid (AWAIT ❁ more dangerous than a jackal)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-06-04 02:11 pm (UTC)(link)
..."More real"? Explain what you mean by that, because I think I'm following you, but I want to be sure.
b0mbshell: (032)

[personal profile] b0mbshell 2017-06-04 09:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know which would be more real. That was a poor description on my part.
But I guess the things that have color are what retrospec made change and aren't original.
roseblooms: can you stand against my hierophant greenery (GLASSES ❁ this is my kakyoin impression)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-06-04 10:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Really? And to think I would've guessed the opposite.
roseblooms: just sit over there and try not to mess up my groove (PETALS ❁ sorry i'm busy being fabulous)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-06-06 12:32 am (UTC)(link)
I would've assumed that the "most real" things are the ones that Retrospec has NO control over.

It's much easier to influence an illusion than it is to change reality.
b0mbshell: (011)

[personal profile] b0mbshell 2017-06-06 03:05 am (UTC)(link)
In this case I was guessing it was us that they changed again. Like when we shrank. Except now we can't see the colors blue and green outside of where they want us to.

I have to think the grass is still using sunlight to do it's thing.
roseblooms: i'm pretty sure it'd involve tasing somebody at least (EXAMINE ❁ wwpd: what would parker do)

[personal profile] roseblooms 2017-06-06 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)
...Oh, and so therefore it — aha. I see what you're getting at, now.

By that logic, would it follow, then, that we ourselves aren't "real" somehow?
b0mbshell: (0𝟕3)

[personal profile] b0mbshell 2017-06-06 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not sure if we are. I've been thinking about that and having to think about that is the worst.