recollecters: (Default)
Recollé Mods ([personal profile] recollecters) wrote in [community profile] retrospec2017-07-01 08:52 pm

loading...

Hello Users,

For those of you who are new: Welcome to Retrospec™, the last social media network you will ever need. You are one of the few selected to test this exciting new platform based on our cutting-edge algorithms. Membership is not currently open to the public. However, we hope you will come to see how useful Retrospec™ is, given time. We have for your use a variety of features such as text, voice, video, and image posts. We encourage you to explore our many options.

For all, new and old: Please be advised that should you go above and beyond the call of duty for Mr. Halloway's little game in the coming days, there may be a reward granted or information given. 100% completion would be the goal for that, should you have an interest. If you have no interest in the matter, please feel free to carry on as usual.

R&D will not be handling further communiques for this month, or possibly the next few months. This should not, of course, have any impact on your usage of Retrospec™.

The first milestone for the second of the colors lost has been met, and accordingly we have diverted resources to fix what could be fixed. R&D has alerted me that a bigger loss may occur in the near future, and I would advise you to be careful, though I am afraid neither they nor I can be much more detailed than that.

Finally, I would like to extend congratulations to those of you who have now reached your sixth month. We hope you will continue to accept our assistance in these trying times.

Thank you for your patience,

Janet Wiseman
Human Resources
Retrspec Incorporated

As of this post green fruits and flowers of this color regain their pigment. (Note: this is not all plants. This is just for flowers and fruits!)

Please feel free to use this post as a network mingle. Every toplevel can be considered a new post, and threadjacking is permitted. No NPC response will be given. Usernames are the character's full real AU names, not aliases or chosen nicknames or usernames, and seemed to have filled themselves in; nothing characters do can change or obscure their names currently. Any new characters will find that the first photo they upload is locked as their profile picture for the rest of the month. Characters who have been in game since February will find their profiles now have a 6 months badge. It does absolutely nothing of note.
daemonized: (08)

[personal profile] daemonized 2017-07-02 02:00 am (UTC)(link)
Ah, Janet. It's amazing how exceptionally useful she seems in comparison to Jim; of course, that's not a terribly high bar to clear. Still, this "helpful" nature of hers could be something of a farce, just to get us all to cooperate. If that's the case, at least Jim is the less duplicitous option.

Or am I being pessimistic? In any case, the idea of being presented with a "little game" isn't always the most reassuring. More hoops to jump through.
daemonized: (112)

[personal profile] daemonized 2017-07-02 05:50 am (UTC)(link)
You realize there are lengthier responses to this post than mine?

Ah, but why do I bother asking.
playdolls: (illu | doktor)

[personal profile] playdolls 2017-07-02 05:53 am (UTC)(link)
Don't make excuses for yourself. You could just say 'they're playing good cop, bad cop'

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-02 05:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] playdolls - 2017-07-02 05:57 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-02 06:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] playdolls - 2017-07-02 06:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-02 06:19 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] playdolls - 2017-07-03 23:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-04 23:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] playdolls - 2017-07-05 01:13 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-05 16:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] playdolls - 2017-07-07 01:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-07 03:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] playdolls - 2017-07-07 04:06 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-07 04:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] playdolls - 2017-07-07 04:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-07 04:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] playdolls - 2017-07-07 04:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-07 04:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] playdolls - 2017-07-07 04:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-07 04:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] playdolls - 2017-07-08 03:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-08 06:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] playdolls - 2017-07-08 17:26 (UTC) - Expand
doitrockapella: (PLACATE ❖ lol okay whatever you say)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2017-07-02 02:34 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, don't tell me you find something sinister about a mysterious app appearing on your phone asking vaguely if you're interested in playing a game.

That doesn't seem untoward in the SLIGHTEST.
daemonized: (02)

[personal profile] daemonized 2017-07-02 05:57 am (UTC)(link)
Ah, forgive me. Obviously I'm just overtly paranoid for no legitimate reason. There's nothing questionable about this app at all.

I wonder sort of game, regardless. Nothing too humiliating I hope.
doitrockapella: (LOOK ❖ god lee stop being such a tool)

[personal profile] doitrockapella 2017-07-02 01:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Mostly I'm impressed at the subtle way this app coerces its recipient into using it, to begin with. As far as I can tell, there's no way of getting answers about it OTHER than by using it — and human beings ARE notoriously curious creatures.

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-02 16:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2017-07-02 16:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-02 16:45 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2017-07-02 17:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-02 17:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2017-07-02 17:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-02 17:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2017-07-02 17:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-02 17:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2017-07-02 17:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-02 17:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2017-07-02 18:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-03 06:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2017-07-03 19:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-04 22:26 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2017-07-06 00:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-06 19:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2017-07-06 22:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-07 18:03 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] doitrockapella - 2017-07-08 00:26 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-09 19:24 (UTC) - Expand
scythegun: (OKAY ⇝ "regaey" is yeager backwards)

[personal profile] scythegun 2017-07-02 02:50 am (UTC)(link)
I wouldn't say pessimistic, I'd say realistic. For all we know this is just Jim posing as Janet! But regardless of what exactly is going on with Jim and Janet and their announcement here, we do have SOMETHING to look forward to in the future.
daemonized: (16)

[personal profile] daemonized 2017-07-02 06:01 am (UTC)(link)
Jim posing as Janet? What an underhanded tactic. Do you really think he possesses the gall to do such a thing?

I wonder what that something is? The erasure of even more colors? Or perhaps they'll steal yet another animal from us?
scythegun: (OKAY ⇝ "regaey" is yeager backwards)

[personal profile] scythegun 2017-07-05 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know him nearly well enough to say, but it's a possibility we can't dismiss!

I'd imagine they'll try something completely different, just to see how we'll react. Though given how badly we reacted to losing a color, they might just take away the rest of the rainbow!

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-06 18:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] scythegun - 2017-07-06 21:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-07 16:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] scythegun - 2017-07-08 04:03 (UTC) - Expand
originallutece: the ojigi tried to eat the delivery boy again (talk; w e l p)

[personal profile] originallutece 2017-07-02 02:52 am (UTC)(link)
I'd still prefer her over him; even if it's a false charm, it's better than that stupid "let's all work together and be grateful" attitude from Jim.
daemonized: (103)

[personal profile] daemonized 2017-07-02 06:04 am (UTC)(link)
If it's false charm, then she's the dangerous one. It's the amicable ones that you have to watch out for. For all we know, she's secretly worse than Jim.
originallutece: don't tell anyone but i'm kinda into this whole cyndi lauper business (talk; shit that's mildly catchy)

[personal profile] originallutece 2017-07-02 06:09 am (UTC)(link)
I'd still prefer that. A refreshing change of pace, wouldn't you say?

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-02 06:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] originallutece - 2017-07-02 06:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-02 06:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] originallutece - 2017-07-02 06:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-02 06:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] originallutece - 2017-07-02 20:48 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-03 06:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] originallutece - 2017-07-03 07:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-03 18:14 (UTC) - Expand
overtwohundred: (due process)

[personal profile] overtwohundred 2017-07-02 03:16 am (UTC)(link)
wonder what they'll do to us if we refuse to play
got any theories, prof
daemonized: (112)

[personal profile] daemonized 2017-07-02 06:08 am (UTC)(link)
Well, Janet says, "If you have no interest in the matter, please feel free to carry on as usual." Though I wonder if you can take her word at face value.

I say... that you might be able to expect even /more/ changes for refusing to play the game. Perhaps they're petty like that.

(no subject)

[personal profile] overtwohundred - 2017-07-02 19:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-03 06:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] overtwohundred - 2017-07-03 06:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-03 06:33 (UTC) - Expand
smothershadow: (Facing away)

[personal profile] smothershadow 2017-07-02 06:36 am (UTC)(link)
From trawling the archives, Ms. Wiseman's response is in keeping with an HR form letter.

Mr. Halloway's correspondences have resembled an attention starved monkey given a keyboard.

That hardly seems like a pessimistic idea to me.
daemonized: (88)

[personal profile] daemonized 2017-07-02 06:39 am (UTC)(link)
Very true, but-- a starved monkey given a keyboard.

[He actually laughs at that on his side.]

I do hope dear Jim is around to read that comment.

(no subject)

[personal profile] smothershadow - 2017-07-02 16:28 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-02 16:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] smothershadow - 2017-07-02 17:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-02 17:24 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] smothershadow - 2017-07-02 17:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-03 06:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] smothershadow - 2017-07-03 22:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-04 23:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] smothershadow - 2017-07-05 21:43 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-06 14:37 (UTC) - Expand
standalonehuman: (TogusaHunh)

[personal profile] standalonehuman 2017-07-02 05:13 pm (UTC)(link)
It makes them perfect for each other, wouldn't you say? One plays games while the other is more straight-forward. Cover each others' weaknesses.
daemonized: (08)

[personal profile] daemonized 2017-07-02 05:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Night and day, yin and yang. Simon and Garfunkel. Take your pick.

Perfect or not, I'm still leery. /And/ they still haven't told us about the state of the engagement! For shame.

(no subject)

[personal profile] standalonehuman - 2017-07-04 23:24 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-05 16:03 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] standalonehuman - 2017-07-05 17:48 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-06 13:52 (UTC) - Expand
crushcard: (pic#11467364)

[personal profile] crushcard 2017-07-02 05:55 pm (UTC)(link)
At least Janet's posts are more polite and easier to get through than Jim's? The condescending posts get grating after a while.

There's a part of me that wants me to figure out how to beat this game of theirs, but my instinct is telling me that would probably be an overly hasty decision to make.
daemonized: (02)

[personal profile] daemonized 2017-07-03 06:19 am (UTC)(link)
If there's anyone who can do it, it's you, Mr. Kaiba. Retrospec is not ready nor worthy of your competitive streak, or am I wrong?

(no subject)

[personal profile] crushcard - 2017-07-03 13:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-03 15:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] crushcard - 2017-07-03 15:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-04 22:12 (UTC) - Expand
livingdeadgirl: (smile 3)

[personal profile] livingdeadgirl 2017-07-02 07:03 pm (UTC)(link)
maybe Jim is just a character they made up to be deliberately terrible
so that we'd be receptive to anybody who came along and sounded halfway reasonable
daemonized: (03)

[personal profile] daemonized 2017-07-03 06:22 am (UTC)(link)
Misdirection. A most classic sort of trick.

If that's the case, do you think it's working? Or do you think most of us would have been inclined to take part in this upcoming "game" regardless of the tone of the post?

(no subject)

[personal profile] livingdeadgirl - 2017-07-03 14:06 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-03 15:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] livingdeadgirl - 2017-07-03 15:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-04 22:19 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] livingdeadgirl - 2017-07-06 14:52 (UTC) - Expand
ladya: (pic#11514925)

[personal profile] ladya 2017-07-02 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, you are being pessimistic.

Just hoping they have good taste in games. I wouldn't say no to a few rounds of beach volleyball.
daemonized: (09)

[personal profile] daemonized 2017-07-03 06:24 am (UTC)(link)
Which implies that you're the more optimistic sort. A rare breed. A literal unicorn.

Beach volleyball? I certainly hope not. Just the thought of the sun beating down on me, relentlessly, while I fumble about in the sand is dreadful.

(no subject)

[personal profile] ladya - 2017-07-04 02:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] daemonized - 2017-07-04 23:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] ladya - 2017-07-05 22:09 (UTC) - Expand