crushcard: (pic#11481100)
KAIBA Seto ([personal profile] crushcard) wrote in [community profile] retrospec2017-09-27 08:32 am

memory within memory bullshit + a thing

Seto Kaiba
27 September 2017 near Enprise

Two things related to this application, so I would prefer if this information wasn't spread to outsiders:

1. Has anyone been the recipient of memory-within-memories? I don't want to think that I'm the only person, and frankly, getting memories of one life is stressful enough without having one in an even more distant past to regain memories of.

2. I'm looking to hire someone with experience in computer graphics, software and animation for a short term project. And before you ask, yes, it's related to Retrospec.

As an addendum, if you were at the Convention in July, my staff should have contacted you with reimbursement by now. If not, please let me know and I'll look into it. I'm not paying this out of my own pocket, but rather, Retrospec seemed fit to return me monetary compensation for July's damages so thank them, not me.

hauhra: (otherwise we'd get along)

[personal profile] hauhra 2017-10-08 08:00 pm (UTC)(link)
An interesting theory, Mr. Kaiba... and one I might have been willing to believe had you not brought up its fatal flaw, having memories from drastically different periods of world history myself. Unfortunately, it's just like you said: it doesn't deal with the headache of who could have multiple lives nearly as well as my suggestions do.

That being said, the only way to know for sure which of our theories is right will probably depend on the sorts of abilities people like us gain back.

In other words, either you or I would have to gain the power to travel through time (or something like that) before we have our answer... unless, of course, Retrospec decides to finally come clean first, though I seriously doubt that will ever happen.