recollecters: (Default)
Recollé Mods ([personal profile] recollecters) wrote in [community profile] retrospec2017-12-01 05:51 pm

loading...

1) don't be dumb. my name isn't a pun on wendigo. i'm not a wendigo. i'm a humanoid from aht.
2) i can probably kill you more efficiently than a wendigo anyway? what the fuck do they even do?
3) i don't care about the other inane bullshit enough to comment.

ok, the number list thing is boring as fuck. moving on. the kids talked about grabbing souls and them being knocked out of alignment last time. i'm allowed to pick one damn thing to clarify here within a bullshit rulebook, so let's clear up this: it's not like anyone is picking and choosing which to grab. one soul looks pretty much like another, you know? i've been waiting a pretty long time to see if any will be from my homeworld.

none of you are.

not like they're trying to grab anyone in particular. but if you were wondering about "why" it's "because you were fucking there". think of it like a band of traveling hoarders. they see remnants of a world in a mess of shards and pick them up before the shards disappear. i was a shard, but i still had my body. i also happened to not be on aht when it met its end.

they don't stay put. pieces and bits of whatever. they travel, and some of them are already here, because you are. so i stick around because maybe eventually someone they pull out of the dark might be someone i knew.

but yeah, no one gives a single fuck about worth. that's the mystical how do you choose me or this other person i remember who deserves it more answer: you happened to be there, and they weren't. or they haven't been yet. you're welcome.

Wendy Guo
Security/Archivist
Retrspec Incorporated

Hi! Just so you know, we've re-stabilized green! Although I see some alerts on my screen so that's not great, something else got knocked out? I have to go figure out what.

But as a tip, unreality functions on a lot of loopholes. Try carrying some words around or thinking outside of the box if you get into a pinch, okay?

Joanne Wiseman
Technician 2nd class
Retrspec Incorporated

As of this post green has been entirely returned to the world and everyone's sense of taste has officially disappeared. You win some, you lose some. Please note that as tiers are reached we may delay them by a week or so per tier in order to allow people to play with the loss effects! While the world regains post may be used for OOC knowledge, please know that nothing is in effect until a mod-announcement goes up (this may be an IC announcement as well, depending.)

The freebie that can be earned on this post requires one thread featuring at least five comments from you with one new character. Please note, we define "new character" as any of the incoming new characters from the application round (regardless of TDM tags you may have done with them) or any in-game character your character has not threaded with before. As usual, this regain should be turned into our regains request post with "December Freebie" and the qualifying thread link in the explanation section! As notated above, this freebie will not qualify past December.

Please feel free to use this post as a network mingle. Every toplevel can be considered a new post, and threadjacking is permitted. No NPC response will be given. Usernames are the character's full real AU names, not aliases or chosen nicknames or usernames, and seemed to have filled themselves in; nothing characters do can change or obscure their names currently.
cattack: (pic#3478400)

[personal profile] cattack 2017-12-02 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
Unfortunately, I've been stuck with this irritating situation for long enough to know it's not going to be anything straightforward.
It's likely to be something completely impossible to understand, and yet, Retrospec's employees will blame us for not understanding it when we fail to utilize the warning.
mutualistic: (pic#11855565)

[personal profile] mutualistic 2017-12-02 02:25 am (UTC)(link)
Somehow that's not entirely surprising either based on their attitudes towards everything. I take it they're always like this?
cattack: (pic#4867983)

[personal profile] cattack 2017-12-02 02:29 am (UTC)(link)
They're always useless, yes.
Some of them are more abrasive, or openly mocking.
Wendy and Joanne appear to be the most forthright among them.
But they apparently have rules in place that stop them from explaining anything, or actively helping.
They spoke as though they are doing all they can, but I do not trust any of them.
mutualistic: icons by me, <user name=limitedwings> @ <user name="vividsplash"> (Default)

[personal profile] mutualistic 2017-12-02 02:37 am (UTC)(link)
I see. That makes some sense. I don't blame you-- I find it difficult to put too much stock in what they've said. But at least it appears that in some regards they've been working to keep things together. But that may be for their own purposes. It's certainly not enough to warrant our trust.
cattack: (pic#3478399)

[personal profile] cattack 2017-12-02 02:41 am (UTC)(link)
They may earn my trust when they are willing to answer my questions.
Or at the very least, speak to us face-to-face, as equals, rather than as ignorant masses to be talked at and subsequently ignored.
And they will certainly not have my trust until the bodies of all on Retrospec are returned to normal.
mutualistic: (pic#11855565)

[personal profile] mutualistic 2017-12-02 02:54 am (UTC)(link)
Most likely the reason they won't speak to us in person is because of how greatly they're outnumbered. Even if there are some who would be willing to let them talk, I'm sure there are some who would take a more radical approach. But I would appreciate a message that isn't just talking circles around an answer in a poor attempt to look more useful than it is.
cattack: (pic#4867983)

[personal profile] cattack 2017-12-02 03:02 am (UTC)(link)
I would hardly blame any who did take a more radical approach.
If they continue inflicting physical bodily changes without warning, I may yet become one of those people.
mutualistic: (pic#11857519)

[personal profile] mutualistic 2017-12-02 04:24 am (UTC)(link)
It's hard not to feel like they've brought this upon themselves. But I'd also be concerned about what kind of retaliation they might make if they really felt threatened.
cattack: (pic#3478399)

[personal profile] cattack 2017-12-02 04:28 am (UTC)(link)
At least they would be honest about their actions then.
But given that last time something big with them happened, the ocean vanished and then monsters appeared, it's probably not wise.
mutualistic: (pic#11855570)

[personal profile] mutualistic 2017-12-02 04:31 am (UTC)(link)
It doesn't leave us with many options, but I'm inclined to agree. I prefer useless over dangerous and hostile.
cattack: (pic#3478400)

[personal profile] cattack 2017-12-02 04:35 am (UTC)(link)
Agreed.
Although, if Jim ever starts talking to us again, many will likely forget reason and want to hit him regardless.
mutualistic: (pic#11855569)

[personal profile] mutualistic 2017-12-02 04:50 am (UTC)(link)
If I might ask, just what did he do to make himself so unpopular?
cattack: (pic#3478400)

[personal profile] cattack 2017-12-02 04:57 am (UTC)(link)
Open condescension and mockery, while we had even less idea of what was happening here.
If you dig back through Retrospec's archives, you'll find him earlier on.
mutualistic: (pic#11857760)

[personal profile] mutualistic 2017-12-02 05:31 am (UTC)(link)
I'll have to do that then. It sounds like they're all very unique characters to say the least. With personalities like that, I'd expect them to clash with one another.
cattack: (What is this shit.)

[personal profile] cattack 2017-12-02 05:34 am (UTC)(link)
I don't know all the details, but apparently, there was infighting to the point where one of them had their entire family wiped out.
So, there certainly used to be.
mutualistic: (pic#11855576)

[personal profile] mutualistic 2017-12-02 05:39 am (UTC)(link)
That's horrid. Though that might explain why they're so keen to follow whatever rules they have in place, if that could be the result of stepping out of line.
cattack: (pic#11741706)

[personal profile] cattack 2017-12-02 05:42 am (UTC)(link)
I don't disagree.
However, I do think their rules are terribly thought through.
mutualistic: (pic#11857765)

[personal profile] mutualistic 2017-12-02 05:47 am (UTC)(link)
No, but as long at they're in place, we probably won't have much luck getting any help from them, frustrating as it is.
cattack: (pic#4867983)

[personal profile] cattack 2017-12-02 05:53 am (UTC)(link)
We will have to hope one of them has a desire to do the right thing that is stronger than their obedience to badly-designed rules.
mutualistic: (pic#11855565)

[personal profile] mutualistic 2017-12-02 06:07 am (UTC)(link)
I suppose that's still possible. It doesn't seem clear just how many of them there are. There might be a few worth trying to get to know who may be willing to help in the future.
cattack: (What is this shit.)

[personal profile] cattack 2017-12-02 06:41 am (UTC)(link)
Perhaps, though I have no idea who would be.
mutualistic: icons by me, <user name=limitedwings> @ <user name="vividsplash"> (Default)

[personal profile] mutualistic 2017-12-02 11:24 am (UTC)(link)
Neither do I. Although I wouldn't say we've met them all yet either. It may be something that makes watching their announcements worthwhile.
cattack: (pic#4867983)

[personal profile] cattack 2017-12-02 06:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Among other reasons.
I'm waiting for them to slip up, and an inconsistency in their story to happen.
mutualistic: (pic#11855565)

[personal profile] mutualistic 2017-12-03 08:12 am (UTC)(link)
That would certainly stir things up. As if some people aren't already at their limit with them. But I think something like that would bring us one step closer to a riot.
cattack: (Default)

[personal profile] cattack 2017-12-03 08:39 am (UTC)(link)
[continued here!]