recollecters: (Default)
Recollé Mods ([personal profile] recollecters) wrote in [community profile] retrospec2018-06-01 05:59 pm

(no subject)

Don't bother the techs.

Seriously, don't. I'm not entirely sure what's going on but all I'm getting is that it's the equivalent of being hacked and someone who knows layer theory better than we do is out there screwing things up and tampering with the project.

I don't have a really good update for you guys, but bear with us. Please?

Zee Carlisle
Hiring Manager
Retrspec Incorporated

Per the mod plotting post, you may use this post to obtain one of this month's freebies! This month's freebie can be earned by turning in a thread on this post that has 10 or more consecutive comments from you.

Please feel free to use this post as a network mingle. Every toplevel can be considered a new post, and threadjacking is permitted. No NPC response will be given. Usernames are the character's full real AU names, not aliases or chosen nicknames or usernames, and seemed to have filled themselves in; nothing characters do can change or obscure their names currently.
justchords: (SANTA'S GOIN NUTS)

[personal profile] justchords 2018-06-13 07:07 am (UTC)(link)
(there is a long pause.) no of course not
ascatic: (12)

[personal profile] ascatic 2018-06-13 06:19 pm (UTC)(link)
[ enjoy an equally long pause back, Apollo ]

Doubt.
justchords: (AHAHAHA FUCK)

[personal profile] justchords 2018-06-14 06:56 am (UTC)(link)
you have no evidence to back up this unwarranted suspicion (so that's an admission of guilt.)
ascatic: (65)

[personal profile] ascatic 2018-06-14 05:45 pm (UTC)(link)
If I need evidence in the first place, I feel that there is something to my potentially unsubstantiated claim.

I will keep my eyes on you, Apollo.
justchords: (SANTA'S GOIN NUTS)

[personal profile] justchords 2018-06-17 08:25 am (UTC)(link)
evidence is necessary for arguments i don't make the rules that's just how things are (he dead.)
ascatic: (5)

[personal profile] ascatic 2018-06-17 05:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Will circumstantial evidence suffice?
justchords: (YOU SUCK AND THIS IS WHY)

[personal profile] justchords 2018-06-20 06:49 am (UTC)(link)
circumstantial evidence is not admissible in a court of law unless backed up by physical damning evidence
ascatic: (32)

[personal profile] ascatic 2018-06-20 03:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh.

Okay.

Apollo, is there a chance that you might have counted me as a cat and not as a human?


[ ROUND TWO maybe he'll catch him off guard...... ]
justchords: (GODDAMMIT DIVA)

[personal profile] justchords 2018-06-23 04:14 am (UTC)(link)
(i'm gonna be a real shit lawyer someday.) only for like a minute, i promise
ascatic: (52)

[personal profile] ascatic 2018-06-23 10:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Ah. This is fine.

Do not worry. I will not punish you for being honest.
justchords: (I AM LOAFUS. LOAFUS CRAMWELL)

[personal profile] justchords 2018-06-25 04:42 am (UTC)(link)
(BOSS HE LOVES YOU...) you're a good boss, a really, really good boss
ascatic: (91)

[personal profile] ascatic 2018-06-25 06:23 pm (UTC)(link)
However, if a punishment were to be doled out, it would be purely coincidental and would have nothing to do with what has transpired.

Thank you for your compliments!
justchords: (SANTA'S GOIN NUTS)

[personal profile] justchords 2018-06-26 07:18 am (UTC)(link)
can i take back my answer
ascatic: (78)

[personal profile] ascatic 2018-06-26 09:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Double punishments for everyone!




Just kidding.

Maybe~