Albert Wesker (
manufactured) wrote in
retrospec2017-07-13 07:29 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
001. text // i'm wide awake the more i sleep
I'll preface this now with the notion that I don't expect anyone to respond with the content of their memories, should this be relevant to them. It's more a question being shouted into the void, because I don't care to keep it in my head any longer. Make of it what you will; treat it as a pure hypothetical if it suits you, it isn't as though I'll know the difference.
But has anyone had the suspicion that they may have been on the wrong side of whatever conflict may have been occurring in these memories of theirs? Or if not something so drastic, perhaps it's just that the person you seem to have been back then was deserving of, at the very least, a solid shake and a slap across the face.
Either way, people like to assert here that whomever you are now isn't the same as the person you're remembering, and I wholeheartedly agree with that notion. However, the question likewise comes up from time to time of whether or not the patterns we recall are what we're destined to fall into again.
That possibility becomes decidedly more difficult to disregard when the memories you receive are of someone that you have neither the interest nor the desire to become.
But has anyone had the suspicion that they may have been on the wrong side of whatever conflict may have been occurring in these memories of theirs? Or if not something so drastic, perhaps it's just that the person you seem to have been back then was deserving of, at the very least, a solid shake and a slap across the face.
Either way, people like to assert here that whomever you are now isn't the same as the person you're remembering, and I wholeheartedly agree with that notion. However, the question likewise comes up from time to time of whether or not the patterns we recall are what we're destined to fall into again.
That possibility becomes decidedly more difficult to disregard when the memories you receive are of someone that you have neither the interest nor the desire to become.
no subject
Thankfully, I don't seem to have been one for wanton mass destruction, however.
no subject
consider it free therapy if you're interested in that kinda thing
but i'll probably skip the life advice part
so i guess it's more like free venting
because i don't really give much of a shit about what you do
and i think that's supposed to make you feel better?
so what it just specific mass destruction
did you look at chicago and be like "fuck that city in particular" and set up camp for a week
no subject
no subject
but okay okay what's a more inoffensive city
middle of fucksville, pennsylvania
no subject
But no, it wasn't anything like that, either. To my knowledge, at any rate.
no subject
if it's out of your knowledge does that mean someone else told you to do things?
no subject
no subject
sounds annoying
but it's still enough to bug you?
no subject
It's nothing that isn't manageable as of yet. I suppose I'll cross that bridge when I get there.
no subject
no subject
Bothered, certainly. But "traumatized" is a little strong.